Observations of a thirty something
Monday, 30 March 2015
What makes a good hostel?
Friday, 2 January 2015
BBC's Big Read
Below are all the results from number 1 to 100 in numerical order!
2. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen
3. His Dark Materials, Philip Pullman 29/05/15
4. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
6. To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
7. Winnie the Pooh, AA Milne
8. Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell
10. Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë
11. Catch-22, Joseph Heller
12. Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë
13. Birdsong, Sebastian Faulks
14. Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier
15. The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger
16. The Wind in the Willows, Kenneth Grahame
17. Great Expectations, Charles Dickens
18. Little Women, Louisa May Alcott
19. Captain Corelli's Mandolin, Louis de Bernieres
20. War and Peace, Leo Tolstoy
21. Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell
23.
24.
25. The Hobbit, JRR Tolkien
26. Tess Of The D'Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy
27. Middlemarch, George Eliot
28. A Prayer For Owen Meany, John Irving
29. The Grapes Of Wrath, John Steinbeck
31.
32. One Hundred Years Of Solitude, Gabriel García Márquez
33. The Pillars Of The Earth, Ken Follett
34. David Copperfield, Charles Dickens
36. Treasure Island, Robert Louis Stevenson
37. A Town Like Alice, Nevil Shute
38. Persuasion, Jane Austen
39. Dune, Frank Herbert
40. Emma, Jane Austen
41. Anne Of Green Gables, LM Montgomery
42. Watership Down, Richard Adams
43. The Great Gatsby, F Scott Fitzgerald
44. The Count Of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas
45. Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh
46. Animal Farm, George Orwell
47. A Christmas Carol, Charles Dickens
48. Far From The Madding Crowd, Thomas Hardy
50. The Shell Seekers, Rosamunde Pilcher
53. The Stand, Stephen King
54. Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy
55. A Suitable Boy, Vikram Seth
57. Swallows And Amazons, Arthur Ransome
58. Black Beauty, Anna Sewell
59. Artemis Fowl, Eoin Colfer
60. Crime And Punishment, Fyodor Dostoyevsky
62.
63. A Tale Of Two Cities, Charles Dickens
64. The Thorn Birds, Colleen McCollough
65. Mort, Terry Pratchett
67. The Magus, John Fowles
68. Good Omens, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman
69. Guards! Guards!, Terry Pratchett
70. Lord Of The Flies, William Golding
71. Perfume, Patrick Süskind
72. The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, Robert Tressell
73. Night Watch, Terry Pratchett
75.
76. The Secret History, Donna Tartt
77. The Woman In White, Wilkie Collins
78. Ulysses, James Joyce
79. Bleak House, Charles Dickens
81.
82. I Capture The Castle, Dodie Smith
84. Gormenghast, Mervyn Peake
85. The God Of Small Things, Arundhati Roy
86. Vicky Angel, Jacqueline Wilson
87. Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
88. Cold Comfort Farm, Stella Gibbons
89. Magician, Raymond E Feist
90. On The Road, Jack Kerouac
91. The Godfather, Mario Puzo
92. The Clan Of The Cave Bear, Jean M Auel
93. The Colour Of Magic, Terry Pratchett
94. The Alchemist, Paulo Coelho
95. Katherine, Anya Seton
96. Kane And Abel, Jeffrey Archer
97. Love In The Time Of Cholera, Gabriel García Márquez
98. Girls In Love, Jacqueline Wilson
99. The Princess Diaries, Meg Cabot
100. Midnight's Children, Salman Rushdie
Thursday, 1 January 2015
Australian to English translations
Wednesday, 24 December 2014
Are you a boy or a girl? The need for relentless labelling.
Labels. Why do we find it necessary to attach them to people and often so hastily and unnecessarily? The other day I was with a couple of friends amongst a bigger group encompassing several people I didn't know. Casually I nodded to one guy and asked 'who's he?' 'Oh, that's Simon, he's gay,' came the response. Beyond his name, was that the most important thing I needed to know about him? With an overtly camp demenour, perhaps it was but I would rather have heard 'Oh, that's Simon, he's a bit of a dickhead,' or 'Oh, that's Simon, he's cool.' Then it occurred to me, I wonder if the same is said about me when I'm out of earshot. I certainly hope people have something far more interesting to say about me behind my back!
So why is it that human nature dictates that we must pigeon hole people based on their gender, sexual preference, (dis)ability, nationality, qualifications, religion... The list is endless. Is it worse that we then make assumptions based on which pigeon hole people belong in or indeed feel uncomfortable if we cannot identify which label to apply to people?
Ash Beckham is a really cool TedX speaker (interestingly I found it really hard not to add labels myself there rather than just present a name and a talent) who speaks openly about 'coming out of your closest' which she uses as a cover all phrase for hard conversations. This story, which forms part of several of her talks, I've played over and over again.
'Several years ago, I was working at the South Side Walnut Cafe, a local diner in town, and during my time there I would go through phases of militant lesbian intensity:not shaving my armpits, quoting Ani DiFranco lyrics as gospel. And depending on the bagginess of my cargo shorts and how recently I had shaved my head, the question would often be sprung on me,usually by a little kid:
"Um, are you a boy or are you a girl?"
And there would be an awkward silence at the table. I'd clench my jaw a little tighter,hold my coffee pot with a little more vengeance. The dad would awkwardly shuffle his newspaper and the mom would shoot a chilling stare at her kid. But I would say nothing, and I would seethe inside. And it got to the point where every time I walked up to a table that had a kid anywhere between three and 10 years old, I was ready to fight. (Laughter) And that is a terrible feeling. So I promised myself, the next time, I would say something. I would have that hard conversation.
So within a matter of weeks, it happens again.
"Are you a boy or are you a girl?"
Familiar silence, but this time I'm ready, and I am about to go all Women's Studies 101on this table. (Laughter) I've got my Betty Friedan quotes. I've got my Gloria Steinem quotes. I've even got this little bit from "Vagina Monologues" I'm going to do. So I take a deep breath and I look down and staring back at me is a four-year-old girl in a pink dress, not a challenge to a feminist duel, just a kid with a question: "Are you a boy or are you a girl?"
So I take another deep breath, squat down to next to her, and say, "Hey, I know it's kind of confusing. My hair is short like a boy's,and I wear boy's clothes, but I'm a girl, and you know how sometimes you like to wear a pink dress, and sometimes you like to wear your comfy jammies? Well, I'm more of a comfy jammies kind of girl."
And this kid looks me dead in the eye,without missing a beat, and says, "My favorite pajamas are purple with fish. Can I get a pancake, please?" (Laughter) And that was it. Just, "Oh, okay. You're a girl. How about that pancake?"
It was the easiest hard conversation I have ever had. And why? Because Pancake Girl and I, we were both real with each other.'1
Even as children we are keen to apply boy/girl labels on people and adults are insistent on applying them to toys. Why is it necessary to have pink and blue variations of the same toy? To have boy's sections and girl's sections in Toys 'r' Us? To specify whether you want a male or female toy with your Happy Meal? Why can't children just play?
Even when I go to the hairdressers I have to pay women's prices for what is essentially a men's haircut (why does short and spiky denote a 'men's' haircut anyway!) which is what prompted me to write this post in the first place. The last time I got a haircut I paid the $25 'men's' price rather than the $30 'women's' price, interestingly without a word uttered from either party. Why can't we always pay for a hair style rather than our perceived gender?
I read an interesting article about labelling gender from an early age and the discomfort that this can bring for many children.
'Hearing that the school would get a new uniform brought a new low. But the head and governors were worried about the arrival of a new academy down the road. So not only were our pupils’ perfectly adequate black blazers now to be replaced by expensively piped-and-pinstriped ones, lest we get “left behind” in the school fashion wars, but we were also informed there would be gender-specific ties – red for boys, orange for girls.
This was five years ago, but I still remember feeling bewildered. In a society that already puts too many arbitrary divisions between people, why create another by making our kids wear different-coloured strips of material?' 2
She then continues; 'Two stories recently reminded me of that letter. First, the case of Maria Muniz, a transgender teenager in Brazil, who was fined by school officials for wearing a skirt. In protest, all her classmates wore skirts – male and female – until the school overturned the decision.
And parents have complained after a primary school in East Sussex introduced “gender neutral” toilets. This is not actually all that unusual. Many new schools are now built with private toilet cubicles that open on to a corridor where the washbasins are lined against the wall.
Nevertheless, the parents said they were concerned that their children would feel “uncomfortable” using toilets occupied at different times by people of the opposite sex – somewhat forgetting that this happens in almost every household in the country. And they apparently worry about bullying, as if girls and boys have always treated each other perfectly in their same-sex washrooms over the years.'2
'In 2000, New York University researchers asked mothers to put their 11-month-old children on to a sloped surface and set the incline to the level they thought their child could reach. Mothers consistently under-estimated the incline that girls could cope with, and set the bar too high for boys.
Before they have even reached the age of one, then, we can see that children are being set different aspirations based on false assumptions about their gender. “Skirts versus shorts” is simply the dress code embodiment of this difference.
Uniforms should do what their name suggests: unify students, instead of dividing them. Doing so won’t suddenly resolve all gender disparity, but it would be a reminder that – in schools, at least – we are all expected to set our intellectual incline at the same level.
It would also reduce the endless list of awkward choices faced by people who, for whatever reason, find gender identification difficult. Personally, I’ve never once thought about which toilet I ought to go into. But I grew up with someone who did – someone who couldn’t play on the sports teams they wanted to, or be in the changing room they felt they belonged in. Making a decision about what tie they should wear would have been torture; likely involving letters from parents, and a sit-down meeting with senior leaders, and lots of “but I have a special exception” pleading – all of which is embarrassing enough for any teenager and even more so for someone already marked out as “different” for intractable reasons.' 2
So why where does this inherent need to categorise people come from and will there ever be a time when we can just accept people for being wholly unique, individual and themselves?
1 http://www.ted.com/talks/ash_beckham_we_re_all_hiding_something_let_s_find_the_courage_to_open_up/transcript?language=en accessed 28/12/14
2 http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/oct/21/lets-scrap-gender-divide-school-uniforms accessed 28/12/14
'If's 'but's and 'it could've been me's - the Sydney Seige
Saturday, 13 December 2014
The JCB song
Wednesday, 26 November 2014
The Book Trust's top 100 children's books
The list is split into 4 sections, mirroring the original list. Each section relates to a different age group - 0 - 5 years, 6 - 8 years, 9 - 11 years and 12 - 14 years.



